|
||||
|
Table: Utility maximization or motivation Introduction: Motivation has to do with inducing certain human behavior by some means. From microeconomics we have the strong concept of utility maximization. In its broadest sense utility is a complete description of what governs human behavior. The concept of motivation or incentives can therefore usefully be studied by looking at means that affect utility and thereby human behavior. Motivation is an important issue in transaction cost economics that stresses the more opportunistic kinds of motivation. This production is inspired by readings of Bernard [1938]. Mayo [1945], McGregor [1960], Simon [1958] and Taylor [1911]. |
||||
|
Types
of motivation |
Elaboration and theoretical connection if any |
|||
|
Rewards
- Utility increasing |
||||
|
1)
Pecuniary benefit |
Classic theory usually simplifies by assuming that utility can be
measured in pecuniary terms. That is reasonably to accept for many physical
goods and services and even for a concept like risk. But for the types of
motivation mentioned below (3-6) the measurement problems seem
overwhelmingly. In modern societies the most prevalent mean to induce
behavior (e.g. work or give up entitlement to a good) is to pay money. Often
classic theory simplifies by assuming money is the only factor that provides
incentives. |
|||
|
2)
Leisure |
Classic theory approximates the utility from leisure by its
opportunity cost the pecuniary value of work. Some jobs include more leisure
time e.g. concessioned industries or firemen and army personnel. That may
explain their relative lower pecuniary wages. |
|||
|
3)
Positive social connections |
The Human Relation branch of Organization Theory emphasis the role of
social connections in organizations. To the degree these are positively
perceived they provide motivation to stay in the organization even if
salaries is low. It has of cause economic interest if the managers are able
to promote a well-perceived atmosphere to keep good employees and attract
others. This theory is young and informal. It has succeeded in stressing the
importance of social relations, but work still need to be done to show how to
create social connections in a way that make organizations more efficient |
|||
|
4)
Positive objectives |
The Human Resource branch of Organization Theory stress that the activity
of the organization may be a motivational factor. One can find many examples
of people doing a couple of hours of unpaid work a week because they get
utility from supporting what they believe to be a good case. |
|||
|
5)
Positive social norms |
The Corporate Culture branch of Organization Theory emphasizes that
management may promote efficiency by creating a corporate culture that makes
employees identifies themselves with the organization. If you feel that the
organization is a part of your own identity then you will care for its
vitality, in other words you are motivated to do your job well. E.g. people
working for IBM may believe that they make the best computers in the world
and feel proud to be a part of that team. |
|||
|
6)
Many degrees of freedom |
In the modern capitalistic society the degrees of freedom are nearly
complete. As long as you don’t hurt anybody you can do as you please. You can
limit these degrees by signing a contract but that will be voluntarily and
probably involve compensation. Therefore this factor of motivation may be
fully exploited. As a result it may be more relevant to consider its negative
counterpart. |
|||
|
Sanctions
- Utility decreasing In general governments are the only one allowed to carrying out
sanctions as a means to motivate people to behave in certain ways e.g. not to
violate laws. This is contrary to private agents that mostly have rewards at
their disposal to induce behavior or the thread to stop a relation. The
degrees of freedom that we have as “law obedient citizens “ are almost
complete. We have the right to move, start business, speak, vote, and live.
These are the rights that we take for granted and most of us would probably
start a war if we were denied them without a ‘fair’ reason. Government’s with
its police and army has potentially unlimited power to combat lawbreakers.
Specifically they may restrict the mentioned freedoms of the lawbreaker. But
normally only fines and imprisonment are used. The reason is the principle of
vise statesmanship: Governments should use as little power as possible to
make people reasonably law obedient. This principle could perhaps be
justified by economic terms as well. |
||||
|
- Copyright 1997-2010, ViamInvest. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Legal notice. |
||||